Pandurang Bhau Karad and Anr. v. Smt Shantabai Kbhau Karad and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
WRIT PETITION NO.: 11574 OF 2010
***
1.Heard. Contention is all necessary
parties essential in the suit for partition
are not joined. The trial Court has refused
to frame the issue for reasons recorded by
it. It has found that plaintiff is claiming
only share of deceased Rama.
2.At this stage, I am not inclined to
interfere in the matter. The petitioner/
defendant can conduct cross examination of
plaintiff and bring on record the fact that
all necessary parties have not been
impleaded.
3.With liberty in favour of the petitioner
to challenge again, if occasion arises,
petition is rejected.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner/Defendant
Coram
B.P.Dharmadhikari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court