Respondent No.2 in the Civil Application, being outside the original Writ Petition parties, was allowed to be deleted from the record.
Application allowed; deletion of Respondent No.2 from record directed to be carried out by 24th January 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 9082 OF 2009
IN
REV. APPLN. ST. NO.; 6315 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.: 763 OF 1989
***
1.Heard. Admittedly, Respondent No.2 in
Civil Application viz. S.L.D.T., Latur was
not party in writ petition. Hence, the same
is allowed to be deleted. Application
allowed accordingly. Necessary deletion to
be carried out by 24th January, 2011.
[B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.]
Dated:12/01/2011.
ans/9082
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Respondent No.2 in Civil Application was a party to the Writ Petition and should be deleted from the record.
Respondent No.2
B.P. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court