A single judge allowed a chamber summons taken by plaintiffs against defendant nos. 1 to 3 and a respondent without objection, disposing the summons pursuant to affidavit grounds.
Chamber summons allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d) and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 909.chs-1522-11
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1522 OF 2011 IN
SUIT NO. 9 OF 1993.
Om Sadan Co.op.Hsg. Soc. Ltd. & Ors. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Om Sadan Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ..Defendants. And Mrs. Urmila Dilip Chandan. ..Respondent. ....
Mr. Jaykar, for Plaintiffs.
Mr. C.D. Patel, i/b. N.S. Patel & Co., for Defendant Nos. 1 to 3. Ms. Laxmi Mankar, for Respondent.
.... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER 2011.
P.C. :
This Chamber Summons is taken out by the Advocate for the Plaintiff on behalf of Plaintiff Nos. 7(a) and 7(b). The Chamber Summons is directed only against Defendant Nos. 1, 2, 3 and the Respondent. The learned Advocate appearing for Defendant Nos. 1, 2, 3 and the Respondent submit that they have no objection if the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d). 2. Perused the Chamber Summons as well as the Affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons. For reasons set out in the Affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d). The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]
Om Sadan Co.op.Hsg. Soc. Ltd. & Ors.
Om Sadan Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Mrs. Urmila Dilip Chandan
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
