This is a single judge order dismissing a notice of motion seeking condonation of delay and restoration of an abatement summary suit. The court rejected the plaintiff's explanations for non-appearance as mere negligence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 28.nms-2452-09
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2452 OF 2009 IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 19 OF 2004.
Shriram Chits (Maharashtra) Limited. ..Plaintiff.
vs.
Mrs. Amarjeet Kaur Gothra & Ors. ..Defendants.
Ms. Archana Sarte, i/b. Sai Kumar Pathrudu, for Plaintiff. None for Defendants.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 23RD NOVEMBER 2011.
P.C. :
In the above Notice of Motion, the Plaintiff has prayed for condonation of delay and has further prayed that the order dated 16th January 2008 rejecting the Summary Suit No. 19 of 2004 be set aside and the Suit be restored to file.
2. The Suit is therefore dismissed.”
2 28.nms-2452-09
Plaintiff Company. It is also contended that the senior staff members from the Plaintiff Company had resigned.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
