The Bombay High Court dismissed part of the suit for want of prosecution and disposed of the remainder by consent between the plaintiff and defendants 1 and 6, modifying a specified date.
Suit dismissed against defendants 2, 3, 4, 5; suit disposed of in terms of consent against defendants 1 and 6 with date correction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 903.s-396-11
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
SUIT NO. 396 OF 2011.
Niranjanlall R. Sanghai. vs. Sushilkumar N. Sanghai & Ors.
..Plaintiff.
..Defendants.
Mr. Girish Kedia, i/b. Divya S. Sanghavi, for Plaintiff. Mr. Sanjay Jain, i/b. Lalit V. Jain, for Defendant No.1. Mr. Manoj G. Agre, for Defendant No.6.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER 2011.
P.C. :
The learned Advocates appearing for the Plaintiff, on instructions state that the Plaintiff is not desirous of continuing the Suit against the Defendant Nos. 2, 3 ,4 and 5 and the Suit be dismissed for want of prosecution. In view thereof, the Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution against the Defendant Nos. 2,3, 4 and 5. The Learned Advocates for the parties now tender consent terms dated 25th November 2011 which are entered into by and between the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 1 and 6. They submit that the consent terms be taken on record and the Suit be disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
2 903.s-396-11
as the Advocates for the Defendant Nos. 1 and 6. The undertakings given in the consent terms are accepted.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
