Disposed
Shankar Mahadeo Dhindale, Sarpanch, and Ors. v. Lavasa Corporaion Ltd.
Bombay HCCAW/3133/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SSK/
1
caw.3133.10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3133 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9448 OF 2010
Lavasa Corporation Limited & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus The Union of India & Ors. ....Respondents and
Sarpanch, Group Grampanchayat Dasve & Ors. ....Intervener/Applicants.
Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Senior Counsel with Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Counsel, Mr. Markand Gandhi, Mr. S.S.Pakle, Mr. Gaurav Joshi, Mr. Anirudha Joshi, Mr. Satyan Vora, Tanvi Gandhi, Mr. Prakash Ghelani, Mr. Sanmish Gala i/b. Markand Gandhi & Co., for the petitioners in petition Nos. 9448 of 2010.
Mr. D. J. Khambatta, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Nitin Jamdar, Special Counsel and Ms. Naweena Kumai and Ms.S.V.Barucha for respondents-Union of India.
Mr.S. K. Shinde, Addl. G.P. for the State.
Mr. P. K. Samdani, Sr. Counsel i/b. Mr. P. R. Arjunwadkar for applicants.
CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RANJIT MORE, JJ.
DATED : 12th JULY, 2011.
P.C.:
The civil application is filed by the office bearers of four GramPanchayats. For the reasons stated in the civil application and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the contents of the civil application, the applicants are permitted to intervene. The civil application is disposed of accordingly.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
Lavasa Corporation Limited & Anr.
The Union of India & Ors.
Sarpanch, Group Grampanchayat Dasve & Ors.
Ranjana Desai
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court