The Bombay High Court disposed of Civil Application No. 124 of 2011, making it absolute in terms of the prayer clause while adjourning the connected PIL and Writ Petition.
Civil Application made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CAI124
mss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2011
IN
P.I.L. NO. 109 OF 2003
KESHAV LAXMAN SHINDE & ANR. .. .. APPLICANTS AND DEEPAK CHANDRAKANT PATODKAR .. .. PETITIONER Vs. YEOLA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .. .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. Rameshwar N. Gite for the applicants Mr. S. G. Talekar for the petitioner Mr. S. S. Kulkarni for R-1 Mr. N. T. Deshpande, AGP for R-2 to 4 Mr. R. N. Hardas for R-6,8,9,11,13 to 16, 18 to 20, 23 to 25, 27 to 31, 33,35,38 to 43,46 to 52, 54,58,60,62,63,66,67,69,70,72,73,75,77,80 to 82, 89 to 90. Mr. P. Patil for R-5 Mr.Chetan Agarwal for R-10 & 91. Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar, Sr.Counsel with Ajay Patil for R-28. Mr. Amol Damle with Mr. Sachin Gite for R-57. Respondents 7 to 21,26,32,34,36,37,44,45,53,56,59,61,64,68,71,74,76,78,79,83,84,86 and 88 are served. Respondents 12,17,55,65,87 are deleted. Mr. P. L. Bhujbal for R-22
CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RANJIT MORE, JJ.
DATED:-13/7/2011
P.C.
We heard learned counsel for the parties and learned counsel for the applicants.
2
CAI124
mss
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Keshav Laxman Shinde & Anr.
Deepak Chandrakant Patodkar
Yeola Municipal Council & Ors.
Ranjana Desai
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
