can be drawn that the service itself was not effected on the petitioner and such an inference without anything on record cannot be drawn. I am satisfied that copy of the petition with all annexures was duly served on the company in liquidation. It is common knowledge that the petitions for winding up are admitted and thereafter when the requirement of the Rules are completed, they are posted for hearing and final disposal. It is not as if there is any time limit for disposing off the proceedings. Therefore, merely because the petition did not reach for hearing and final disposal for seven years or more and reached thereafter, is no ground for recalling the order of winding up and particularly on the spacious pleas that are now raised. It is clearly an after thought of the applicants as they were aware of the winding up order. Had they not been aware, they would not have entered into any correspondence with the Liquidator. It is clear that as early as on 29th December 2008, the Liquidator called upon each one of the applicant to file statement of affairs. Thereafter, a meeting was fixed and a notice of that meeting was also given. In reply to that notice on
