L and T Finance Ltd. v. Babu Poma Rathod and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of the arbitration petition. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbpl79.11.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 79 OF 2011
L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner.
Vs.
Babu Poma Rathod & Ors.
....Respondents.
Ms. S.I. Joshi i/by M/s. S.I. Joshi & Co. for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 17th MARCH, 2011
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks to
withdraw the present Petition. The Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
L & T Finance Limited
Babu Poma Rathod & Ors.
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court