Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. v. Manish B. Tambat and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
ssm IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbp162.11.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 162 OF 2011
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd.
....Petitioner.
Vs.
Manish B. Tambat & Anr.
....Respondents.
Ms. Priya Crasto for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 17th MARCH, 2011
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner makes
statement that the parties have settled the matter. The petition is
accordingly disposed of, as settled.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd.
Manish B. Tambat
Respondent No. 2
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court