The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition filed by M/s. Kopran Ltd. since the parties had arrived at a settlement and signed consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1815.10.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1815 OF 2010
M/s. Kopran Ltd.
....Petitioner.
Vs.
Shailendra Bhaskar Parab & Ors.
....Respondents.
Mr. Jay Desai i/by M/s. Desai & Desai Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. Dilip N. Mandavia for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 11th MARCH, 2011
P.C.:
The parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly signed the consent terms dated 11th March, 2011. The same is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. It is signed by the authorized officer of the Petitioner as well as Respondent No.1 and their respective advocates. There is no objection of any kind to the consent terms.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
M/s. Kopran Ltd.
Shailendra Bhaskar Parab
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
