The petitioner sought to withdraw an arbitration application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as a pending application with the arbitrator existed. The application was allowed as withdrawn.
Application disposed of as withdrawn. No costs to any party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbap193.08.sxw
1
ssm
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
....Petitioner.
Vs.
M/s. Discovery Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
....Respondents.
Mr. Himanshu Kode a/w Ms. Amrita Joshi i/by M/s. The Law Point for the Applicant.
Ms. Sanaya Dadachanji a/w Ayesha Panwala i/by M/s. Manilal Kher, Ambalal & Co. for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Kannan Thevar i/by M/s. Mulla & Mulla for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 25th FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C.:
Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
instructions, seeks to withdraw the present Application as the Petitioner/Applicant has already filed an Application under Section 17
of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the Arbitrator and the same is pending.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
M/s. Discovery Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
