Disposed
L and T Finance Ltd. v. Javed Afsar Shaikh and 2 Ors.
Bombay HCCHS/154/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssm IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
chs154.11.sxw
1
ssm
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 749 OF 2009
L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner.
Vs.
Mr. Javed Afsar Shaikh & Ors.
....Respondents.
Ms. Shakuntala Joshi i/by M/s. S.I. Joshi for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 11th FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C.:
Considering the averments made and as per the order passed by
this Court in the Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Petitioner has already disposed of the vehicle, the Chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). No costs.
2 However, it is subject to payment of necessary costs, charges and expenses of the Receiver, if any, to be paid by the Petitioner.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the chamber summons should be allowed pending realization of costs and expenses of the Receiver.
L & T Finance Limited
Mr. Javed Afsar Shaikh & Ors.
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court