The court refused leave to the applicant to file an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, holding that the respondent was not the drawer of the cheque and faced no liability.
Leave to file appeal refused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appln 354 of 2011
1
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.354 OF 2011
Hasmukh N Magia .. Applicant -versus Mr. P. Muthukumar and anr .. Respondents.
applicant in persons
Mrs. U. V. Kejariwal, APP for the Respondent State. Mr. A.J. Uniyad for respondent No.1.
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 17th June, 2011
P.C.
2 appln 354 of 2011
facing any liability. There is no error in the judgment of the learned Sessions Coiurt. Leave refused. Appeal dismissed.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to file appeal against acquittal of respondent No.1 for one who was not the drawer of the cheque should be granted?
Hasmukh N Magia
Mr. P. Muthukumar
R.C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
