Merchant M. Irfan v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order fixing time for furnishing address of respondent No.2; failure to comply will lead to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPLN-23.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.23 OF 2011
Merchant M. Irfan.... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
& Anr..... Respondents
Shri Devendra Udani for the Applicant.
Ms V.R. Bhosale, APP, for the State.
DATED: JUNE 16, 2011
P.C:
If the applicant fails to furnish the
correct address of respondent No.2 within two
weeks, the application would stand dismissed
for want of prosecution, without further
reference to the Court. If the correct address
is furnished, re-issue the notice, returnable
four weeks thereafter.
Merchant M. Irfan
The State of Maharashtra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court