In bail proceedings, the High Court rejected the application, holding that no case for bail was made out. The Court noted the applicant was convicted of her step-son's death and refused to examine evidence inadequacies at this stage.
Bail application rejected; Criminal Appeal listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appa 222 of 2011
1
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.222 OF 2011
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.130 OF 2011
Dipika Suthar .. Applicant
-versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent.
Mrs. Mallika Ingale, for the Applicant.
Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent State.
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J.
DATED: 17th June, 2011
P.C.
2 appa 222 of 2011
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant convicted of causing death by drowning.
Whether the inadequacies in evidence should be examined at the bail stage.
Dipika Suthar
The State of Maharashtra
R.C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
