Bench granted bail to the applicant in connection with a murder case pending at Bhadgaon Police Station. The court held that circumstantial evidence did not connect the applicant to the prosecution story.
Bail granted in connection with Cr.No. I-43/11 in the sum of Rs. 15,000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3240 OF 2011
Rajendra s/o Raghunath Pardeshi
Applicant
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent
Shri . S.G.Ladda, Advocate for the applicant Shri . B.V.Wagh, APP for the respondent / State
CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 22nd November, 2011
PER COURT :
1. Heard learned Advocates of both sides.
2
liquor shop, the present applicant was connected with him.
ORDER
( R.Y. GANOO, J. )
vsm/criappln3240.11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in the criminal proceedings.
Rajendra s/o Raghunath Pardeshi
The State of Maharashtra
R.Y. GANOO
J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
