The applicant (State) challenged a prior bail order dated 15 December 2010. The court held it was impermissible for the State to challenge its own order in an application of the same nature.
The Criminal Application was rejected as it did not survive legal scrutiny.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1675 OF 2011
The State of Maharashtra Applicant
V E R S U S
Sunil Ramrao Upalkar
Respondent
Shri K.S. Hoke-Patil, APP for the applicant / State Shri V.D. Sapkal, Advocate for the respondent
CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 18th November, 2011
PER COURT :
( R.Y. GANOO, J. )
SRM/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State can challenge a prior bail-granting order by the same court.
The State of Maharashtra
Sunil Ramrao Upalkar
R.Y. Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
