State sought leave to appeal acquittal of husband in dowry death case. Court found allegations of monetary demand appeared fabricated. Held evidence not proved for offences under IPC 306, 498-A, etc. Leave refused and application dismissed.
leave to file appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appln 187 of 2011
1
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.187 OF 2011
The State of Maharashtra
.. Applicant.
-versus
Sunil Pandurang Dundgekar & ors Respondent.
Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the Applicant State.
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 14th June, 2011
P.C.
2 appln 187 of 2011
allegations of demand of Rs.1,00,000/- for starting business appear to be after thought. Considering the nature of evidence tendered it cannot be said that the learned Judge erred in concluding that the offences for which respondents were charged, were not proved. There is no error or improbability in the conclusions recorded. The application is therefore, rejected. Leave refused. Appeal dismissed.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant leave to file an appeal against acquittal in a matrimonial offence.
Whether the evidence proved the offences of Dowry Death and Attempt to Consume Suicide.
The State of Maharashtra
Sunil Pandurang Dundgekar
R.C. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
