Single judge granted bail to the appellant convicted under Section 326 IPC, who was originally charged under Section 307 IPC, during the pendency of his appeal, ordering him to furnish fresh bonds.
Appellant released on bail on furnishing fresh bonds in the same amount as during the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appa 312of 2011
1
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.312 OF 2011
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.174 OF 2011
Vijay Balappa Shirgaonkar .. Appellant. -versus The State of Maharashtra and anr .. Respondents.
Mr. Anand S Patil, for the Appellant.
Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent State.
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 14th June, 2011
P.C.
2 appa 312of 2011
up for hearing in near future, the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing fresh bonds in the same amount on which he was on bail during the trial.
(R. C. CHAVAN, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant could be released on bail during the pendency of the criminal appeal as the hearing was unlikely to occur in the near future.
Whether the conviction under Section 326 IPC was sustainable given the medical certificate characterized the injury as grievous despite the complaint not showing grievous hurt.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Balappa Shirgaonkar
State of Maharashtra
R.C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
