An application seeking bail was withdrawn by the learned counsel on instructions. The court permitted the withdrawal and directed the lower court to dispose of the main trial within four months.
The applicant's application was permitted; the learned Judge is directed to ensure expeditious disposal within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CR.APL NO.216/2011
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
V/S
THE STATE OF MAH
Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s
or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders
Mr. R.R.Karpe, Adv., for the
applicant.
Mr. N.B.Patil, APP for State.
...
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATE: 22-2-2011
1.Heard. On instructions,
learned counsel withdraws the
application.Permitted.
Considering the accused to be in
custody from 8.11.2009, for an
offense under Sections 379, 411,
109 read with Section 34 of IPC,
the learned Judge seized with the
matter shall ensure expeditious
disposal within four months of
communication. Inform.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL)
JUDGE
...
AGP/216-11crapl
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application requires active adjudication or if the counsel's withdrawal warrants immediate permission.
Whether the trial court must ensure expeditious disposal of the trial given the accused is in custody.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAVINDRA SAKHARAM KANADE
THE STATE OF MAH
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court