In a bail application, the Single Judge dismissed the plea for pre-arrest bail, observing the applicant failed to discharge monitoring duties in a large housing scheme, leading to a Rs. 3.35 crore scam.
Application dismissed; interim protection vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Cri.Appln.No.339/2011
1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLN/339/2011
VITTHAL LALU RATHOD
V/S
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Office notes, office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.GHANEKAR NILESH S. Adv. for applicant; Mr. NB PATIL. APP for State.
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL,J.
DATE :21st February, 2011.
2
Cri.Appln.No.339/2011
bearing thumb impressions of the beneficiaries, the details of amounts against their names are kept blank; in few of the cases, revenue stamps are signed by the beneficiaries without disclosing as to receipt of the amounts. The blank spaces indicate, without actual payments, arrangement to interpolate payments, was to be ensured,
3
Cri.Appln.No.339/2011
no houses under the Scheme are erected/constructed, still the applicant released the payments by issuing the cheques to the dead persons and how such amounts are released in their favour or could be received by such dead persons.
JUDGE
bdv/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted to the applicant, the Block Development Officer accused in a cheque forgery and embezzlement case.
Victthal Lalu Rathod
The State of Maharashtra
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court