Disposed
The State of Maharashtra v. Prakash Gulab Wayase
Bombay HCAPPLN/175/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
175-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appln 175-2011
1
Anand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.175 OF 2011
The State of Maharashtra..Applicant
V/s.
Prakash Gulab Wayase..Respondent
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale, APP, for the Applicant -
State
None for the Respondent
CORAM:R.C.CHAVAN, J.
DATE:20TH JUNE, 2011
P.C.
.Heard the learned APP.
2.The learned APP made available for my
perusal notes of evidence and the documents
which were proved at the trial. The learned
Additional Sessions Judge has set aside
conviction of the accused and acquitted the
accused on re-appreciation of evidence. The
observations of the learned Additional
Sessions Judge may require a scrutiny. Leave
granted.
Appln 175-2011
2
3.Admit.
4. Call for R & P.
5. Action under Section 390.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
R.C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court