The High Court held that the criminal appeal has abated due to the death of the sole appellant/applicant. No further consideration was required.
The appeal was held abated and consigned to the repository.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PPD
1
4.appa.875-04-apeal.448-02
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.875 OF 2004
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.448 OF 2002
Kamlesh Shamlal Saroj. ..Applicant. Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.
..Respondent.
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.448 OF 2002
Kamlesh Shamlal Saroj. ..Appellant.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.
Mr.None for the Applicant/Appellant. Ms.M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 18th FEBRUARY, 2011.
P.C.
that Accused No.2 / sole Appellant has since expired. In the circumstances, nothing survives for consideration in the Application as also the Appeal. Office to treat the Appeal filed by accused No.2 /
Appellant as abated. Accordingly, the record be consigned to the record.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
Kamlesh Shamlal Saroj
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
