any unlawful demand, and at worst it could be called an unwarranted solicitation for help. In any case, the learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the possibility of the victim herself being frustrated because of separation with the husband for want of proper accommodation at Mumbai and having consumed poison on finding that her father, who had promised to come to the fair after arranging for money but did not turn up, cannot be ruled out. While the applicant undoubtedly had no business make any demand from his father-in-law but this does not imply that because there was a demand it was followed up by ill treatment or harassment, only because the victims brother and father have chosen to make such allegations after the unfortunate incident, when the victim was not staying with the applicant at Mumbai, and staying only intermittently, the question of applicant's harassment or ill treatment of the victim would not arise. In view this, the trial Judge should have considered this possibility of victim's own desire to end separation and
