Anticipatory bail application withdrawn by applicant after Investigating Officer stated arrest was not required; associated intervention application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
590aps
rng
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI.ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN NO.590/ 2011
Shri Gaurav Mahendra GokalGandhi . Applicant
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Ramesh Chheda for Applicant
Mr.Y.S.Shinde APP for State
Ms.Seema Gupta i.b Mr.A.M.Saraogi for Intervenor
in Application No.396/2011
Mr.Ravindra Mane PSI present in court
P.C.
1. The learned APP on instructions from the
Investigating Officer makes a statement that the
Applicant is not an accused and is not required
to be arrested in crime No.123 of 2011
registered with Andheri (E) police station. In
view of this statement, learned counsel for the
Applicant seek to withdraw the Application.
withdrawn. In view of the above, Application
590aps
No.396 of 2011 for intervention also does not
survive and stand disposed of.
J.H.BHATIA, J
Gaurav Mahendra Gokal Gandhi
State of Maharashtra
H.Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court