The appellant filed a criminal appeal challenging a conviction under Sections 376(2)(f), 354, and 506 of the IPC. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as the accused was released and did not contact counsel despite summons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
agk
app178-07
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.178 OF 2007
Abdul R. Shaikh ..Appellant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.
Mr.Sandeep A. Bhagwat for the appellant. Mr.Y.M. Nakhawa, A.P.P. for the respondent.
CORAM : J.H. Bhatia, J.
DATE : 25th August, 2011.
P.C. :
2 app178-07
the accused nor his relatives have contacted him and given any instructions. It appears that in view of the release after undergoing sentence, the accused - appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abdul R. Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
