Raju Makdum Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bombay High Court rejected an anticipatory bail application. However, citing the applicant's alleged mental status, the court allowed limited protection until the applicant surrenders to seek regular bail.
What did the court decide?
Application rejected; applicant allowed to surrender to the Magistrate by 9.9.2011 to seek regular bail without arrest in the interim.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
572.11
rng
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTI. BAIL APPLICATION NO.572 OF 2011
Raju Makdum Shaikh . Applicant
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Gunaratan Sadavarte for Applicant
Mr.Y.S.Shinde APP for State
CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J
DATE:26th August 2011
P.C.
1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for anticipatory bail in a case involving an attempt to commit murder.
Whether the applicant's mental status warrants limited protection if bail is denied.
Whether the applicant may surrender to seek regular bail within a specified timeframe.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Raju Makdum Shaikh
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
J.H.BHATIA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court