A writ petition was disposed of as infructious because the petitioner had already received the documents and records, causing the cause of action to cease to exist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 793 OF 2009
Shivshakti Shikshaan Prasarak Mandal
..Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
..Respondents
Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar, for Petitioner.
Mr.V.P. Malanvankar, A Patel of State of Maharashtra for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4
CORAM : D. D. SINHA & A. A. SAYED , JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 1, 2010.
P.C.
1 Heard Mr. Bandiwadekar, leaned counsel for the petitioner., Mr.
Malvankar, learned Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner has received the documents and
records and therefore, the cause of action involved in this petition does not
survive. In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of as infructious.
(D. D. SINHA, J.)
( A. A. SAYED, J.)
2
Shivshakti Shikshaan Prasarak Mandal
The State of Maharashtra
D. D. Sinha
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
