The High Court granted the appellant four weeks further time to deposit a decretal amount. Failure to produce proof of deposit by the archived date may result in dismissal for non-prosecution.
Further time of four weeks granted to deposit the decretal amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6276 OF 2008 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 396 OF 2010
| State of Maharashtra. Versus |
... | ... | Applicant. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaywant Namdeo Gawand & Ors. | ... | ... | Respondents. |
Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, AGP for the Applicant. Mr. Sachin Punde for the Respondent.
CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR and A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 9TH JUNE, 2010.
P. C.:
By way of indulgence, the applicant is granted further time to deposit the entire decretal amount which they were expected to deposit within three months from 10th March, 2010. Further time of four weeks is granted to the applicant. If proof of deposit is not produced in the Registry within the extended time, the office shall treat the appeal as well as the civil application having been dismissed for non-prosecution. The cross-objection may, however, proceed in accordance with law.
Sd/-
Sd/-
(A. A. SAYED, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
State of Maharashtra
Jaywant Namdeo Gawand & Ors.
A. M. Khanwilkar
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
