The petition was allowed to be withdrawn with permission to file an appropriate remedy. The High Court recorded that no opinion on the merits was expressed and all contentions, including maintainability, were kept open.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with permission to adopt the appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP+7684
mss
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 7684 OF 2010
BALWANT BAPUSO CHAVAN & ORS. .. PETITIONERS
Vs.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
RESPONDENTS
Mr. P. M. Arjunwadkar for the petitioners Mr. V. S. Gokhale, AGP
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 7/10/2010
P.C.
Counsel for the petitioners states that he has instructions to withdraw the petition with permission to adopt the appropriate remedy. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
We have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Needless to say that all contentions of both sides are kept open including question of maintainability.
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
(R. V. MORE, J.)
2
WP+7684
mss
Balwant Bapuso Chavan & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Ranjana Desai
R. V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
