Petitioners' counsel received instructions to withdraw writ petitions WP Nos. 2728/2010 and 2876/2010 against a remark regarding punishment for copying. The Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petitions.
Allowed withdrawal of petitions and disposed of the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SSK/
1
WP/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2728 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2876 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court’s Or Judge’s Orders. Coram, appearances,Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. Sudhir V. Sadavarte, Advocate for petitioners in both the petitions. Mr. R. V. Govilkar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP.
CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RANJIT MORE, JJ.
DATED : 8th OCTOBER, 2010.
P.C.:
Mr. Govilkar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent- the Maharashtra State Technical Education Board states that in the petitioners’ mark lists there shall be no remark that the petitioners were punished for copying. This statement is accepted by this Court. In view of this, Mr. Sadavarte, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has instructions from Mr. Banaji Balwant Chavan, who is present in the Court on behalf of all the petitioners, to withdraw the petitions. The petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and are disposed of, as such.
(RANJIT MORE, J.) (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
Ranjanade Sai
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
