Disposed
Manoj Prabhakar Gharat v. City and Industrial Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/3439/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP/3439.09
SSK/
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3439 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances,Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders
Court’s Or Judge’s Orders.
Mr. Shreepad Murthy, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. M. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP.
CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RANJIT MORE, JJ.
DATED : 8th OCTOBER, 2010.
P.C.:
Mr. Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the fact that the plans have been sanctioned by CIDCO, he does not press the petition. The petition is disposed of, as not pressed.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
SSK
Respondent no.1
Ranjana Desai
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court