The petitioner filed the writ petition which was withdrawn during the hearing. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and vacated the interim relief, if any.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim relief, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4266 OF 2009
Kamlesh s/o Subhash Bedse
...Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
Shri D.B.Shinde, advocate holding for
Shri N.L.Choudhary, advocate for the petitioner Shri D.V.Tele, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 6 Shri A.N.Nagargoje, advocate for respondent nos. 4 and 5.
CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH
AND
SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ.
DATED : 12th October, 2010
PER COURT :
Advocate Shri D.B.Shinde instructed by Shri Choudhary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition.
We heard Shri D.V.Tele, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 6 and Shri A.N.Nagargoje, learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 5.
Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
(SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.)
dbm/wp4266.09
Kamlesh s/o Subhash Bedse
The State of Maharashtra
S. B. Deshmukh
Shrihari P. Davare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court