The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly without any order as to costs.
The writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2951 OF 2010
Sudhakar Dattatraya Deomali .... PETITIONER
V E R S U S
Union of India & Oths.
.... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Y.V. Kakade, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ.
DATE : 08/04/2010
PER COURT :
[ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V.HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE
knp/WP 2951.10
2
Sudhakar Dattatraya Deomali
Union of India & Ors.
P.V Hardas
S.V Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
