Petitioner filed a writ petition regarding service or benefits. The court noted that a related writ petition (No. 2239 of 2001) had rendered the present petition unsustainable in view of the order passed therein, leading to its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2248 OF 2001
2
CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH
AND
SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ.
DATE OF RESERVING THE JUDGMENT : 06.10.2010 DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE JUDGMENT : 14.10.2010
J U D G M E N T : [ Per Shrihari P.Davare, J. ]
2 In view of the order passed in Writ Petition No. 2239 of 2001 and for the reasons stated therein, this Writ Petition does not survive and same stands disposed of. Rule stands discharged accordingly. No costs.
(SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.)
dbm/wp2248.01
Aadhar s/o Ramrao Patil
The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Social Welfare Department
The Collector, Dhule
The Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nashik Division
Shri Shivaji Vidya Prasarak Sanstha
Mr. Shivram Mahadu Pardeshi
S.B. DESHMUKH
SHRIHARI P. DAVARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court