Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their writ petition. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Bench at Aurangabad) allowed the withdrawal of the petition and dismissed it accordingly without costs. This order is procedural with no substantive legal principles laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2051 OF 2010
Ashok s/o Uttreshwar Jadhawar and ors.
.. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
.. Respondents
Shri S.Y.Dhas, Advocate holding for Shri N.P.Bangar, Advocate for petitioners
Shri K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for respondents 1 to 3
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ
DATE : 13th April 2010
PER COURT :
Learned Counsel for the petitioners states on instructions that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
( S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) ( P.V. HARDAS, J.)
(vvr/2051.2010wp)
Ashok s/o Uttreshwar Jadhawar and ors.
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
P.V. Hardas
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
