The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed Civil Application No. 4300 of 2010 as it was not pressed by the learned counsel for the applicants following the dismissal of the underlying writ petition.
Civil Application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4300 OF 2010 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8333 OF 2005
Smt. Shakuntala Laxman Sasane & ors.
..APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr S.S. Thombre,Advocate for the applicants; Mr K.G. Patil, AGP for respondents no.1 to 4; Mr G.K. Thigale, Advocate for respondents no.5 & 6; Mr A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondents no.9 & 10
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S. V. GANGAPURWALA,JJ.
DATE : 13th April, 2010
PER COURT :
Learned Counsel for the applicants state that in the light of dismissal of the writ petition, the applicants do not wish to proceed with this Civil Application. Civil Application is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
(S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
( P.V.HARDAS, J. )
amj/ca4300.10
Shakuntala Laxman Sasane
The State of Mah.
P.V. Hardas
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
