The High Court disposed of a writ petition questioning the rejection of a parole application, directing the petitioner to avail the available statutory appeal remedy.
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to file an appeal before the State Government.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 crwp1814-10
agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1814 OF 2010
Gulab Aabasha Bhosale ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.
..Respondent.
Mr.Vijay Garad i/by Murtaza Najmi, Advocate appointed for the petitioner. Ms.S.V. Gajare, APP for the State.
CORAM : A.M. Khanwilkar, & U.D. Salvi, JJ. DATE : 8th September 2010.
P.C. :
with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the State Government,
2 crwp1814-10
who shall decide the same on merits and not reject it on the ground of delay.
August 2010 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No.2301 of 2010 be forwarded to the petitioner, who is in jail, forthwith.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Criminal Writ Petition No.2301 of 2010Referred¶1
Gulab Aabasha Bhosale
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
