The appellant's bail application was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. No substantive decision on bail was rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appa779-10
1
agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.779 OF 2010
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.541 OF 2008
Shrihari Eknath Suryavanshi ..Applicant.
Versus
Mrs.S.D. Shinde
..Respondent.
Mr.Dilip Bodake for the applicant. Mr.K.V. Saste, APP for the State.
CORAM : A.M. Khanwilkar, & U.D. Salvi, JJ.
DATE : 7th September 2010.
P.C. :
behalf of the applicant though initially the application was filed through jail. He further states that he may be permitted to withdraw this application, so that he would take steps to file proper bail application.
with liberty as prayed.
(U.D. Salvi, J.) (A.M. Khanwilkar, J.)
Shrihari Eknath Suryavanshi
Mrs. S.D. Shinde
A.M. Khanwilkar
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
