The criminal writ petition was dismissed due to non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel did not appear, and the learned APP noted that even a copy of the petition had not been furnished to the office of the Public Prosecutor.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
35 wp.1647.10
ndm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1647 OF 2010
Arun Ramchandra Gadekar and ors. ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and anr. ... Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. P.A. Pol, PP for the State.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and U.D. SALVI, JJ. DATE : 26th August, 2010.
P.C.
None appears for the Petitioners when the matter is called
out. The learned APP submits that even copy has not been furnished in the office of the Public Prosecutor. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
Arun Ramchandra Gadekar and ors.
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
A.M. KHANWILKAR
U.D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
