Petitioner sought direction to register an offence. Court noted the Police Station had already registered the case. Petition was disposed of as nothing survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.462.10.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.462 OF 2010
Kantilal Hari Sapra Versus
The Senior Inspector of Police & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar for Petitioner.
Dr.F.R.Shaikh, A.P.P. for Respondents.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATED:- AUGUST 25, 2010.
P.C.
wp.462.10.sxw
2
complaining about improper investigation or otherwise, that aspect can be considered on its own merits in accordance with law.
(U.D.SALVI, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Kantilal Hari Sapra
The Senior Inspector of Police & Ors.
A.M.Khanwilkar
U.D.Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
