Writ petition challenging an interim order was held infructuous as the main petition was already decided. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1413 OF 2000
Maharashtra State Electricity Boards & Another Vs. Ramesh Jaisinghrao Solanki & 4 Others
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's
Mr. R. E. Moharir Adv for petitioner.
CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J.
DATED: 13th AUGUST, 2010.
Heard Mr. Moharir. The writ is against
interim order. Main petition is already disposed of/decided. Consequently nothing survives. Writ Petition becomes infructuous and disposed of.
JUDGE
svk
2
Maharashtra State Electricity Boards & Another
Ramesh Jaisinghrao Solanki & 4 Others
K. U. Chandiwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
