In this Civil Revision Application, the court dismissed the matter because both counsel were absent and the single-word order indicates the petitioner had lost interest in the proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 717/1998
Qamar Education Society and others
..versus..
Dr. Mohammad Sayyed Ansari and others
=-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==
C ORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 12th AUGUST, 2010.
Both counsel absent.
A letter was addressed to the petitioner seeking discharge of earlier advocate. A pursis to this effect No. 8363/2010 is tendered.
The writ petitioners indeed is communicated by communication, bearing his signature, showing acknowledgment.
It appears, the petitioner has lost interest in the C.R.A. It is accordingly dismissed.
(K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE.
Rvjalit
Qamar Education Society
Dr. Mohammad Sayyed Ansari
K.U. Chandiwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
