This court condensed a 15-day appeal delay as sufficient cause and allowed a notice of motion. No substantive dispute was addressed.
Notice of motion allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Delay in filing appeal of 15 days condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
srp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 771 OF 2010
IN APPEAL (L) NO. 67 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 191 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 52 OF 2009 Devkabai Y. Keni & Anr. ..Appellants. Versus Sunita Anant Mahant & ors. ..Respondents.
Mr. P. Majumdar i/b M. P. Savla & Co., for respondent no. 24.
Coram : F.. I. REBELLO & R. V. MORE, JJ. Date : June 15, 2010.
P. C. :
Though other respondents are served, none appears on their behalf. There is delay of 15 days in preferring the appeal. The cause shown, in our opinion, amounts to sufficient cause. Hence, delay is condoned. Notice of motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(R.V. MORE, J.)
(F. I. REBELLO, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a delay of 15 days in preferring an appeal constitutes sufficient cause for condonation.
Devkabai Y. Keni & Anr.
Sunita Anant Mahant
ors
F. I. REBELLO
R. V. MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
