The High Court set aside an impugned order regarding the amount of the program for being defamatory on its own and disposed of the appeal and related notice of motion, with the appellant undertaking no further telecast pending final disposal.
The impugned order is set aside. The appeal and Notice of Motion are disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SRJ
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL N0.241 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.892 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.876 OF 2010
M/s. Lemon Entertainment Ltd. & Others
.. Appellants
V/s.
RMP Infotech Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr. M.M.Vashi with Mr. S.B.Batliwala & A.A.Siddiquie, for Appellants. Mr. Satish Maneshinde with Ms. N.S.Nappinai and Ms. Pradnya Kadam, for Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 14, 2010
P. C.:
recorded as to what statement as published are defamatory on this ground itself the impugned order is liable to be set aside.
SRJ
1
(R.V. MORE,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
M/s. Lemon Entertainment Ltd. & Others
RMP Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
F. I. Rebello
R. V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
