A bench disposed of an appeal against the refusal of an ad-interim order without addressing substantive contentions, remitting the matter to the Single Judge for early hearing and disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SRJ
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL N0.220 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.329 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.251 OF 2009
Mr. Bharat J. Patel & Others
.. Appellants
V/s.
Mrs. Urmila R.P. Pathak & Others
.. Respondent.
Mr. V.A.Thorat, Sr. Counsel, i/b. Bipin Joshi, for Appellant No.1. Mr. S.U.Kamdar, Sr. Counsel , i/b. Bipin Joshi, for Appellant Nos. 2 & 3. Mr. D.D.Madon, Sr.Counsel i/b. Shiralkar & Co., for Respondent No.7. Mr. Ryan D’Souza with Mr. Jose George, for Respondent Nos. 11 & 12.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 14, 2010
P. C.:
urged. We do not propose to go into the details.
SRJ
1
Respondent Nos.7, 11 and 12, the learned counsel makes a statement that they will not ask for any adjournment.
(R.V. MORE,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)
Mr. Bharat J. Patel & Others
Mrs. Urmila R.P. Pathak & Others
F.I. REBELLO
R.V. MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
