Application to set aside a High Court order dismissing an appeal for want of prosecution. The court held there was no ground to recall the order as the Government Advocate's submission led to its dismissal. Application dismissed.
Application to set aside the order dismissing the appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 809 OF 2005
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 4 OF 1998
STATE OF GOA,THROUGH L.A.O. Versus MR.JANARDANA U.N. COUNTO(DEC) & ORS.THROUGH LRS
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. M. Salkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V. A. Lawande, Advocate for the respondent 4(A) & 4(B).
Coram:D. G. KARNIK, J.
Date:7th October, 2010
P.C.:-
"The learned Government Advocate submits that it is not possible to serve the unserved respondents. If that be so, first Appeal has to be dismissed for want of prosecution and is dismissed accordingly."
D. G. KARNIK, J.
ssm.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court's order dismissing the first appeal for want of prosecution due to inability to serve respondents can be set aside.
STATE OF GOA,THROUGH L.A.O.
MR.JANARDANA U.N. COUNTO(DEC) & ORS.
D. G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
