The First Appeal was dismissed as the appellant's counsel reported absence of instructions and no other representative was present.
The first appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
FIRST APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2002
SHAILENDRA V.NAIK & ORS. ... Appellant Versus SPL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER ... Respondent
Ms. P. Timble, holding for Mr. V. Menezes, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. E. Afonso, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram:D. G. KARNIK, J.
Date:1st October, 2010
P.C.:-
Learned Counsel for the appellant reports that she has no instructions. She states that an intimation has been given to the appellant. No one else is present for the appellant. The appeal is dismissed under Order 41, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
D. G. KARNIK, J.
ssm.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHAIENDRA V.NAIK & ORS.
SPL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
D. G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
