Dismissed
Shailendra v.Naik and Ors. v. Spl.Land Acquisition Officer
Bombay HCFA/169/2002
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In First Appeal No. 169 of 2002 involving a land acquisition officer, the single judge found the appellant represented by counsel had no instructions and no other representative was present. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed via order under Order 41, Rule 17 CPC as a non-substantive order.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed under Order 41 Rule 17 CPC due to lack of instructions and absence of other representatives.